you bring religion to ...the stew? ... enough ingredientes already?
My first post had a Bible quote, I think. Besides everything is
religion ask Al Gore the name of his new religion he's preaching, I
think it's something like, "The Sky Is Falling." He's right about
that, but he's (intentionally?) wrong about most of his doctrine. The
sky is falling because YOU won't listen to reason and insist on going
a different direction; well then justify it. United we stand, Divided
the sky falls.
And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand,
but hath an end.
No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods,
except he will first bind the strong man; [Oscar] and then he will
spoil his house. [or Oscar could unfairly seize the throne by buying
votes or other]
But when a stronger than he [Oscar] shall come upon him, and overcome
him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and
divideth his spoils.
He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with
me scattereth. [No peace without unity]
No amount of darkness can overcome a single ray of light. [With US or
you're with the terrorist- terrorism would not survive if Oscar wasn't
in the way. T/F]
Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness.
[Iraq wasn't a threat. T/F]
... condemned already...this is the condemnation...[Oscar] loved
darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the
light, [he makes up bogus excusses, and calls people names] lest his
deeds should be reproved.
But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be
made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Religion was formally on the table when you declared name calling part
of your religious doctrine AND tried make as if that were compatible
with Biblical doctrine.
A light, a hope....A NAME...(look up, dummy)
Wes, friend...Some of them [issues] are too important, I respect them so much... never would I
demean them or myself by ignoring such things.
These sacred issues, as you say, are beyond my comprehension. You're
response to my call to "refute-don't dismiss" and "justify you're
ways" is "You are a total...MORON." And this, after I showed you that
that is as unbiblical as anything, (Matthew 5:22) Name calling is
demeaning yourself and you do demean the issues when you demean me
instead of refuting me. (Hate speech reflects poorly on the hater.)
Allow me to rephrase your words.
what I reject, TOTALLY LOATHE ...THE ACT of engaging YOU...
what I reject,
lest [he] should be reproved.
evil hateth the light,
THE ACT of engaging YOU
neither cometh to the light,
A servant will not be corrected by words: for though he understand he
will not answer.
unfit, unwilling, and unprepared to bring in valid arguments
Which of my many arguments are you referring to?
You repeat what others tell you to repeat, all entirely well known: I already
know the arguments..
Not all are my words, but it's my mosaic. I am not a propaganda
regurgitating machine, show me an instance of it. Your doctrine is
upside-down at it's core; to say you've heard it before says one of us
is dense or dishonest. It has to be you because I say the Earth is
round, you say "heard it before." I say man walked on the moon, you
say "retard, idiot, moron." I say Elvis is dead you say, "Jesus
saves." I say Jesus can not save you unless you are born again, you
say "shall I enterth into the womb a second time." (John 3:3)
Everything is either propaganda or truth. That statement is either
true or bogus propaganda, it all depends on whether you are the black
lemming or the white one.
You're exactly the type of person engineered' for a special purpose: To give
support to the people that created you, incapable of creating, of producing
a single thought worth listening to. UNDERSTAND THIS: You are not programmed
to contradict your masters.
I know you are but what am I? Where is the flaw in my programming? Do
you want me to corrupt the entire system?
I prefer to come up with my own words
You prefer to make up your own religion?
... and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word
that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their
Thus saith the Lord, Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither
let the mighty man glory in his might, let not the rich man glory in
But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and
knoweth me, that I am the Lord which exercise lovingkindness,
judgment, and righteousness, in the earth: for in these things I
delight, saith the Lord.
But unto the wicked God saith, What hast thou [Oscar] to do to declare
my statutes, or that thou [Oscar] shouldest take my covenant in thy
Seeing thou [Oscar] hatest instruction, and castest my words behind
A reproof entereth more into a wise man than an hundred stripes into a
An evil man seeketh only rebellion: therefore a cruel messenger shall
be sent against him.
I so much hope this time to be clear (I pray)
Pray to whom?
I prefer to come up with my own words
Here are some of my own words, (I guess in order to quote sound wisdom
you have to shape it into something else; isn't that like making it
something other than sound wisdom) If I quote something exactly or
close enough they are in fact my words, I have said that "we can't
walk down separate paths," or something close to that. Guess where I
got those, (my?) words?
Can two walk together, except they be agreed?
I say no, one of our logics will have to be corrupted all the way to
the core. All Mega truths are built on 1 or 0 bits. Where am I in
error and why?